Use single point of failure ISA 2004 or go with ISA 2000 Ent
Exchange Server Forum Index Exchange Server
Discussion forums for Microsoft Exchange Server users.
Microsoft Outlook
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web ExchangeServerHelp.com
Use single point of failure ISA 2004 or go with ISA 2000 Ent

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Exchange Server Forum Index -> Design
Author Message
Marlon Brown
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 7:16 am    Post subject: Use single point of failure ISA 2004 or go with ISA 2000 Ent Reply with quote

Hi there,

I would like to setup ISA 2004 to "protect" front-end servers. My question
here is that ISA 2004 Enterprise is not available yet and therefore I will
be unable to providade "redudancy" if I go with ISA 2004 Standard.

In this scenario do you think a more solid approach would be using a couple
of boxes with ISA 2000 Enterprise (NLB) and later migrate this to ISA 2004
Enterprise ?
Or do you think I should take advantage of ISA 2004 Standard (single point
of failure) and keep a stand-by ISA 2004 box that I could switch over
manually ?

Let me know which option you think is more solid.

Back to top
Al Mulnick
Guest





Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:09 am    Post subject: Re: Use single point of failure ISA 2004 or go with ISA 2000 Reply with quote

I think it totally depends on your requirements. Sounds like you have some
leeway though.


"Marlon Brown" <marlon_brownj@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OCeJMXCqEHA.3876@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Hi there,

I would like to setup ISA 2004 to "protect" front-end servers. My question
here is that ISA 2004 Enterprise is not available yet and therefore I will
be unable to providade "redudancy" if I go with ISA 2004 Standard.

In this scenario do you think a more solid approach would be using a
couple
of boxes with ISA 2000 Enterprise (NLB) and later migrate this to ISA 2004
Enterprise ?
Or do you think I should take advantage of ISA 2004 Standard (single point
of failure) and keep a stand-by ISA 2004 box that I could switch over
manually ?

Let me know which option you think is more solid.

Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Exchange Server Forum Index -> Design All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Windows Server Dedicated Servers
Contact Us
New Topics Powered by phpBB