| Author |
Message |
admin
Guest
|
 Posted:
Thu Nov 25, 2004 10:12 am Post subject:
RUS on Front-End or Back-End? |
|
|
Hi,
What's the best practice to place RUS service? should it be placed on F/E or
B/E servers? and may I know why one is better than another one? Can I have
your advise?
thanks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Al Mulnick
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Nov 25, 2004 8:36 pm Post subject:
Re: RUS on Front-End or Back-End? |
|
|
Put it on the BE server. The FE server is expendable (transient data) in
the scheme of things, while the BE servers tend to be larger (processing
power etc) and get more attention when something doesn't work.
FWIW, you really only need an Exchange server that has some extra cycles to
do this though. After the first run most runs will be a lot less intensive.
Depending on your configuration you could pick either and it would work.
Personally, I tend to pick the public folder server if separate.
Al
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:OHAN%23Tq0EHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Hi,
What's the best practice to place RUS service? should it be placed on F/E
or B/E servers? and may I know why one is better than another one? Can I
have your advise?
thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neil Hobson [MVP]
Guest
|
| Posted:
Mon Nov 29, 2004 2:18 pm Post subject:
Re: RUS on Front-End or Back-End? |
|
|
It's a little more simple than that; RUS no longer runs on an FE server
since E2k SP2. See http://support.microsoft.com/?id=313646.
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
For Exchange news, links, and tips, check:
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@ncDOTrr.com> wrote in message
news:uhAPbwv0EHA.1408@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Put it on the BE server. The FE server is expendable (transient data) in
the scheme of things, while the BE servers tend to be larger (processing
power etc) and get more attention when something doesn't work.
FWIW, you really only need an Exchange server that has some extra cycles
to
do this though. After the first run most runs will be a lot less
intensive.
Depending on your configuration you could pick either and it would work.
Personally, I tend to pick the public folder server if separate.
Al
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:OHAN%23Tq0EHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
Hi,
What's the best practice to place RUS service? should it be placed on
F/E
or B/E servers? and may I know why one is better than another one? Can I
have your advise?
thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Guest
|
| Posted:
Thu Dec 02, 2004 9:09 am Post subject:
Re: RUS on Front-End or Back-End? |
|
|
would that apply to Exchange 2k3 SP 1 as well?
thanks
"Neil Hobson [MVP]" <neil.hobson@nospam.silversands.co.uk> wrote in message
news:%23DqfNwe1EHA.2572@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | It's a little more simple than that; RUS no longer runs on an FE server
since E2k SP2. See http://support.microsoft.com/?id=313646.
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
For Exchange news, links, and tips, check:
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@ncDOTrr.com> wrote in message
news:uhAPbwv0EHA.1408@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Put it on the BE server. The FE server is expendable (transient data) in
the scheme of things, while the BE servers tend to be larger (processing
power etc) and get more attention when something doesn't work.
FWIW, you really only need an Exchange server that has some extra cycles
to
do this though. After the first run most runs will be a lot less
intensive.
Depending on your configuration you could pick either and it would work.
Personally, I tend to pick the public folder server if separate.
Al
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:OHAN%23Tq0EHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
Hi,
What's the best practice to place RUS service? should it be placed on
F/E
or B/E servers? and may I know why one is better than another one? Can
I
have your advise?
thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SM
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Dec 03, 2004 1:53 am Post subject:
Re: RUS on Front-End or Back-End? |
|
|
Yes that applies to Exchange 2k3 SP 1 as well (You can not run RUS on a 2003
FE Server).
-SM
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:u7TvjxB2EHA.1392@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | would that apply to Exchange 2k3 SP 1 as well?
thanks
"Neil Hobson [MVP]" <neil.hobson@nospam.silversands.co.uk> wrote in
message
news:%23DqfNwe1EHA.2572@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
It's a little more simple than that; RUS no longer runs on an FE server
since E2k SP2. See http://support.microsoft.com/?id=313646.
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
For Exchange news, links, and tips, check:
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@ncDOTrr.com> wrote in message
news:uhAPbwv0EHA.1408@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Put it on the BE server. The FE server is expendable (transient data)
in
the scheme of things, while the BE servers tend to be larger
(processing
power etc) and get more attention when something doesn't work.
FWIW, you really only need an Exchange server that has some extra
cycles
to
do this though. After the first run most runs will be a lot less
intensive.
Depending on your configuration you could pick either and it would
work.
Personally, I tend to pick the public folder server if separate.
Al
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:OHAN%23Tq0EHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
Hi,
What's the best practice to place RUS service? should it be placed on
F/E
or B/E servers? and may I know why one is better than another one?
Can
I
have your advise?
thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:59 pm Post subject:
Re: RUS on Front-End or Back-End? |
|
|
thank you very much!!
"SM" <sm@mail.org> wrote in message
news:ePruXiK2EHA.4072@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Yes that applies to Exchange 2k3 SP 1 as well (You can not run RUS on a
2003
FE Server).
-SM
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:u7TvjxB2EHA.1392@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
would that apply to Exchange 2k3 SP 1 as well?
thanks
"Neil Hobson [MVP]" <neil.hobson@nospam.silversands.co.uk> wrote in
message
news:%23DqfNwe1EHA.2572@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
It's a little more simple than that; RUS no longer runs on an FE server
since E2k SP2. See http://support.microsoft.com/?id=313646.
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
For Exchange news, links, and tips, check:
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@ncDOTrr.com> wrote in message
news:uhAPbwv0EHA.1408@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Put it on the BE server. The FE server is expendable (transient data)
in
the scheme of things, while the BE servers tend to be larger
(processing
power etc) and get more attention when something doesn't work.
FWIW, you really only need an Exchange server that has some extra
cycles
to
do this though. After the first run most runs will be a lot less
intensive.
Depending on your configuration you could pick either and it would
work.
Personally, I tend to pick the public folder server if separate.
Al
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:OHAN%23Tq0EHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
Hi,
What's the best practice to place RUS service? should it be placed
on
F/E
or B/E servers? and may I know why one is better than another one?
Can
I
have your advise?
thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:00 pm Post subject:
Re: RUS on Front-End or Back-End? |
|
|
me again.. is there a kb article saying about this? thanks again..
"SM" <sm@mail.org> wrote in message
news:ePruXiK2EHA.4072@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Yes that applies to Exchange 2k3 SP 1 as well (You can not run RUS on a
2003
FE Server).
-SM
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:u7TvjxB2EHA.1392@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
would that apply to Exchange 2k3 SP 1 as well?
thanks
"Neil Hobson [MVP]" <neil.hobson@nospam.silversands.co.uk> wrote in
message
news:%23DqfNwe1EHA.2572@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
It's a little more simple than that; RUS no longer runs on an FE server
since E2k SP2. See http://support.microsoft.com/?id=313646.
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
For Exchange news, links, and tips, check:
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@ncDOTrr.com> wrote in message
news:uhAPbwv0EHA.1408@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Put it on the BE server. The FE server is expendable (transient data)
in
the scheme of things, while the BE servers tend to be larger
(processing
power etc) and get more attention when something doesn't work.
FWIW, you really only need an Exchange server that has some extra
cycles
to
do this though. After the first run most runs will be a lot less
intensive.
Depending on your configuration you could pick either and it would
work.
Personally, I tend to pick the public folder server if separate.
Al
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:OHAN%23Tq0EHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
Hi,
What's the best practice to place RUS service? should it be placed
on
F/E
or B/E servers? and may I know why one is better than another one?
Can
I
have your advise?
thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
admin
Guest
|
| Posted:
Fri Dec 03, 2004 7:04 pm Post subject:
Re: RUS on Front-End or Back-End? |
|
|
that's ok... I didn't notice that the KB was mentioned earlier...
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:uiw$O$S2EHA.2824@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | me again.. is there a kb article saying about this? thanks again..
"SM" <sm@mail.org> wrote in message
news:ePruXiK2EHA.4072@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Yes that applies to Exchange 2k3 SP 1 as well (You can not run RUS on a
2003
FE Server).
-SM
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:u7TvjxB2EHA.1392@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
would that apply to Exchange 2k3 SP 1 as well?
thanks
"Neil Hobson [MVP]" <neil.hobson@nospam.silversands.co.uk> wrote in
message
news:%23DqfNwe1EHA.2572@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
It's a little more simple than that; RUS no longer runs on an FE
server
since E2k SP2. See http://support.microsoft.com/?id=313646.
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
For Exchange news, links, and tips, check:
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"Al Mulnick" <amulnick_No_SPAM@ncDOTrr.com> wrote in message
news:uhAPbwv0EHA.1408@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Put it on the BE server. The FE server is expendable (transient
data)
in
the scheme of things, while the BE servers tend to be larger
(processing
power etc) and get more attention when something doesn't work.
FWIW, you really only need an Exchange server that has some extra
cycles
to
do this though. After the first run most runs will be a lot less
intensive.
Depending on your configuration you could pick either and it would
work.
Personally, I tend to pick the public folder server if separate.
Al
"admin" <admin@test.com> wrote in message
news:OHAN%23Tq0EHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
Hi,
What's the best practice to place RUS service? should it be placed
on
F/E
or B/E servers? and may I know why one is better than another one?
Can
I
have your advise?
thanks
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in