| Author |
Message |
Jonathan
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:58 am Post subject:
E2K3 on a DC |
|
|
I've read several times that it is not a good practice to have Exchange run
on a domain controller. Can someone point me in the right direction as to
why this is not a good practice?
Thanks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nuevo
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:58 am Post subject:
Re: E2K3 on a DC |
|
|
Here is a twist to the original question. Why do MS recommend that you do
not demote a DC if Exchange 2k3 is installed? Here is the KB article:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822179
The only issue that I can think of is because Exchange uses the local DC
(and GC) (for DSAccess/DSProxy) it will not dynamically find another DC/GC
if dcpromo is used to demote the local DC. Can anyone confirm?
The article gives no specifics so your input is appreciated.
Thanks.
Nue
"Jonathan Norris" <JonathanNorris@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:859AA162-E3F9-4D2D-8F40-326108DD87A7@microsoft.com...
| Quote: | Here are some technical reasons I have found just doing a search.
http://www.petri.co.il/problems_with_exchange_2003_installed_on_domain_controllers.htm
--
Jonathan
No Warrenties Implied, Did you do a FULL backup today??????
"Jonathan" wrote:
I've read several times that it is not a good practice to have Exchange
run
on a domain controller. Can someone point me in the right direction as
to
why this is not a good practice?
Thanks. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neil Hobson [MVP]
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:58 am Post subject:
Re: E2K3 on a DC |
|
|
I blogged the main reasons here:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2004/02/exchange_on_a_d.html
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
For Exchange news, links, and tips, check:
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"Jonathan" <Jonathan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C3098652-F5D8-4B0E-AFD9-38F5762C9A94@microsoft.com...
| Quote: | I've read several times that it is not a good practice to have Exchange
run
on a domain controller. Can someone point me in the right direction as to
why this is not a good practice?
Thanks. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonathan Norris
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:58 am Post subject:
RE: E2K3 on a DC |
|
|
For larger environments its never/seldom done. You have no choice with Small
Business server so its not always possible.
--
Jonathan
No Warrenties Implied, Did you do a FULL backup today??????
"Jonathan" wrote:
| Quote: | I've read several times that it is not a good practice to have Exchange run
on a domain controller. Can someone point me in the right direction as to
why this is not a good practice?
Thanks. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonathan Norris
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:58 am Post subject:
RE: E2K3 on a DC |
|
|
Here are some technical reasons I have found just doing a search.
http://www.petri.co.il/problems_with_exchange_2003_installed_on_domain_controllers.htm
--
Jonathan
No Warrenties Implied, Did you do a FULL backup today??????
"Jonathan" wrote:
| Quote: | I've read several times that it is not a good practice to have Exchange run
on a domain controller. Can someone point me in the right direction as to
why this is not a good practice?
Thanks. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonathan
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 29, 2005 5:58 pm Post subject:
Re: E2K3 on a DC |
|
|
I just learned something new. That's exactly what I was looking for. Thank
you.
"Neil Hobson [MVP]" wrote:
| Quote: | I blogged the main reasons here:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2004/02/exchange_on_a_d.html
--
Neil Hobson
Exchange MVP
For Exchange news, links, and tips, check:
http://www.msexchangeblog.com
"Jonathan" <Jonathan@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C3098652-F5D8-4B0E-AFD9-38F5762C9A94@microsoft.com...
I've read several times that it is not a good practice to have Exchange
run
on a domain controller. Can someone point me in the right direction as to
why this is not a good practice?
Thanks.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|