Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Exchange enterprise edition storage group/database distribut

  1. #1
    Daniel Peterson Guest

    Exchange enterprise edition storage group/database distribut

    So we're just about to roll out Exchange, and our schedule has
    unfortunately been moved up by "pressures from above", so I haven't had
    enough time to work out how I want to lay out storage groups, databases,
    etc.

    We have Exchange enterprise edition, with probably 300ish users, and I
    anticipate 100 or gigs of data after the initial conversion. Multiple
    storage groups seem like a good idea for backup/recovery purposes, but I
    also would like to save some space on things with single instance storage
    and such, which you lose with multiple storage groups if you're not careful.

    How are other people laying out their Exchange data?

  2. #2
    janet Guest
    Our company has around 400 users for one exchange server so I created one
    storage group with multiple stores, so if I loose a store it does not effect
    the stores.

    "Daniel Peterson" wrote:

    So we're just about to roll out Exchange, and our schedule has
    unfortunately been moved up by "pressures from above", so I haven't had
    enough time to work out how I want to lay out storage groups, databases,
    etc.

    We have Exchange enterprise edition, with probably 300ish users, and I
    anticipate 100 or gigs of data after the initial conversion. Multiple
    storage groups seem like a good idea for backup/recovery purposes, but I
    also would like to save some space on things with single instance storage
    and such, which you lose with multiple storage groups if you're not careful.

    How are other people laying out their Exchange data?


  3. #3
    Shai Netanel Guest
    Hello

    If you have one server, you need to consider a disk failure…
    The best way is to create 2 partition for the database (preferable 2 raid 5
    array(
    Create 2 storage group and create 2 mailbox stores on each storage group
    ** DO NOT PLACE THE edb FILE ON RAID 1 (MIRROR)!!!

    The best place for the exchange log files is on mirror array – Away from the
    edb files…
    Be aware that every storage group manage sufficient set of log files.

    Regards,
    Shai Netanel

    --




    "janet" wrote:

    Our company has around 400 users for one exchange server so I created one
    storage group with multiple stores, so if I loose a store it does not effect
    the stores.

    "Daniel Peterson" wrote:

    So we're just about to roll out Exchange, and our schedule has
    unfortunately been moved up by "pressures from above", so I haven't had
    enough time to work out how I want to lay out storage groups, databases,
    etc.

    We have Exchange enterprise edition, with probably 300ish users, and I
    anticipate 100 or gigs of data after the initial conversion. Multiple
    storage groups seem like a good idea for backup/recovery purposes, but I
    also would like to save some space on things with single instance storage
    and such, which you lose with multiple storage groups if you're not careful.

    How are other people laying out their Exchange data?


Similar Threads

  1. Moving users from Storage Group to Storage Group in Exchange
    By Bill Bradley in forum Administration
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-21-2005, 09:58 AM
  2. Database wont mount in Recovery Storage Group
    By Michael Lockhart in forum Administration
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-06-2005, 09:58 AM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-30-2005, 09:58 AM
  4. Database not mounting in the Recovery Storage Group
    By Sach in forum Administration
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-22-2005, 09:59 AM
  5. Storage group vs database
    By bigdaddio@news.postalias in forum Deploy
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-13-2005, 01:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Other forums: Access Forum - Microsoft Office Forum - CAD Forum